Strategy MCP
It's like having a professional strategist in your project.
Positioning and copy run as a practitioner-built 32-step engine inside Cursor, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Claude Desktop. Docs land in the repo. Reasoning stays visible. You keep judgment - the process stays on the work in front of you.
Prompt
Press enter to run Strategy MCP inside your IDE
Real file structure
Every step writes a real file into your project.
Prompt the scaffolding from the sitemap. Drop in the copy that's already written. Apply a template for the finishing style. That's the build - because the sitemap, the copy, and the design direction are already sitting in your repo, not spread across tabs you have to reconcile yourself.
01-persona.md
Persona
brand-strategy.md
Brand strategy
pricing-strategy.md
Pricing strategy
01-buyers-journey.md
Buyer journey
copywriting-strategy.md
Copywriting strategy
Everything the engine actually walks through.
Not a single prompt. A practitioner-built sequence - personas through final page copy, in order, with reasoning at every step.
Personas and buyer journeys - who you're actually talking to, and what they're thinking before they'll trust you.
strategy-docs/business/brand-strategy.md
Built so you can trust what it hands back.
The parts that matter most when you're the one putting your name on the output.
Dev flow
Fits your dev flow.
Runs inside Cursor, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Claude Desktop. No separate app, no tab to switch to, no copy-pasting output between tools.
strategy-docs/business/brand-strategy.md
Reasoning
Shows the work.
Every step explains why a conclusion landed - named frameworks, visible reasoning - so you can keep what checks out and reject what doesn't.
strategy-docs/business/brand-strategy.md
Your judgment
Rails, not a replacement brain.
You already have the instincts. This gives them structure: a sequenced, gated engine instead of a mental checklist you're never sure was complete.
strategy-docs/business/brand-strategy.md
Fits your dev flow.
Runs inside Cursor, Claude Code, Windsurf, or Claude Desktop. No separate app, no tab to switch to, no copy-pasting output between tools.
Shows the work.
Every step explains why a conclusion landed - named frameworks, visible reasoning - so you can keep what checks out and reject what doesn't.
Rails, not a replacement brain.
You already have the instincts. This gives them structure: a sequenced, gated engine instead of a mental checklist you're never sure was complete.
strategy-docs/business/brand-strategy.md
Who it's for
Built for capable people who already ship.
Charge what the work deserves.
You can deliver the build end-to-end, then rewrite the homepage until the rate starts to apologize. Run a process you can check in Cursor so discovery calls and proposal numbers stop flinching.
Verify a process.
Don't leap on vibes.
Start at $15 for the first month - full engine access. Run it on a real project. If week-one docs aren't something you'd actually use, cancel.
Start - $15 first monthReviews
Real reviews only, checked before they go live - not manufactured.
No reviews yet.
Simple pricing, no crippled teaser.
One tier. Full engine access from day one. $15 for your first month, then $29/month - cancel anytime.
Strategy MCP
For freelancers, indie founders, and studio leads who ship product and keep freezing on positioning and copy.
then $29/month
- Full engine access from day one - not a crippled teaser
- Every step, personas through final page copy - nothing gated behind a higher tier
- Visible reasoning at every step, not just delivered output
- Zero added inference cost - runs on the Cursor, Claude, or Copilot subscription you already pay for
- Strategy docs write locally into your project - never stored on Strategy MCP servers
- Cancel anytime
Before you ask
The honest answers to the questions worth asking before you pay for anything.
Why $15 first, then more later?
$15 is a verification month, not a discount gimmick - low enough to try, full enough to judge the whole engine on a live project.
Is this another AI wrapper?
If you're wondering: good. Strategy MCP is a 32-step engine with named frameworks, not a one-shot brand kit that could belong to anyone.
Is this just fancy prompting?
Blank Cursor or Claude chats are excellent for building. They are not a strategy methodology - the difference is rails, sequence, and reasoning you can inspect.
What stops bad strategy from shipping?
Hard fails in the engine: copy review checks, THIN-VOC labeling, competitor price-band honesty, real contact destinations (no YOUR-* / placeholder tokens), no VOC research footnotes in visitor copy, sitemap↔copy coverage, strategy-docs kept out of git by default, and a per-page Ship Gate that mirrors approve_copy_phase so final approval stays clear.
How is this different from Jasper, Notion AI, or brand-kit generators?
Those tools optimize for speed and fluent paragraphs - confident but empty. This stays in your IDE, runs an ordered engine through personas to page copy, and shows why each step landed.
Why not just hire a strategist?
For this work, you don't have to. Strategy MCP is the strategist in the project: the same ordered process - positioning, messaging, copy - without a discovery call or a sales-gated engagement. Docs land in the repo. You still approve what ships.
Couldn't I just build this myself? I'm a developer.
Probably, yes - the skills aren't the blocker. The harder part is tracking how positioning and pricing norms shift year to year instead of freezing at whatever you knew the day you built it.
What about client or business data?
Strategy docs write locally into your project. Reports and client or business strategy data are not stored on Strategy MCP servers.
Do I pay extra for AI generation or inference?
No added inference meter. The MCP returns workflow and framework-grounded prompts; your own AI subscription does the generation.
Is cancel painful? Is this a subscription trap?
Cancel anytime, plain language, no punishment theater. $15 first month is a verification purchase - keep going only if it earned it.